UG2 Reasonable Maps

I guess it's possible.

This theory is plausible if we take into some consideration the location of both bridges. Firstly sorry for not showing any pictures because I don't have any internet on my pc at the moment, but as soon as I have I'll post some to provide some evidence.
The theory is plausible because there are some places that a bridge like this can exist. The first one being somewhere after the greenhouse in Beacon hill and connecting the suburban area to the city center. The second one being more obscure is if we say that the destination between the tunnel and the bridge connecting the city to beacon hill is more realistic (let's say more than 250m from one another) we can squeeze the bayview bridge there.
Staying with the first theory in mind there is some evidence both in the lod of the city (seen from jackson hights) and in the Bayview bridge drag showing some proof. In the drag race we can see in the distance the suburban area with no greenhouse no tall buildings blocking the river (in a way showing that it may be down the river) and more proof to back this up is the placement of the buildings in the city center (they may look rather chaotically placed but going back in the normal city and looking at the buildings from the east some of them fit where they are in the drag (but only some of them). The others which can't be found anywhere in the game can be explained as just simply they can't be seen in the city center but rather in the "suburban"-"city area" border (in other words where the strangely placed buildings in the eastern corner of the city, there is some subway construction too). This whole theory can be taken with a grain of salt but there is not just one evidence of the possibility of the bridge being placed in the normal city, just being placed down the river.

UPTADE: When I was talking about down the river I meant from the bridge down
and this is a possible location of the bridge 
And just form comparison by what I mean about the bridges being next to each other look at this

What's wrong with that?

i honestly don't know

This thread had to happen on NFST2 too. If nixty didn't make it, me or someone else would have had to.

Yeah, MW made a big deal only out of Carbon's map. Carbon's map is the only one he finalized, and I can see why. It was about strong NFS maps theorizing, to the point it becomes a proven fact with no other alt. However, there were two requirements doing that. First, a really mysterious map with hidden roads. Second, a map whose hidden roads were not creating any paradoxes such as having their locations (based on their surroundings) literally in place of unhidden/free roam drivable roads. And the only good ol' NFS game which met those two requirements was Carbon. But then again, this doesn't mean we shouldn't focus on UG2's map. I already explained it in the OP:

"By the way, people should really read the conversations I had with MW, Speedy and Kacpa (posted them in page 2 of this thread). In short, others (from Admins like MW/Speedy/Kacpa to normal members like Nixty) are allowed to make their own UG2 maps too and call them a first as long as they are different from mine. For example, some other maps may include the closed tracks like mine, but may also include Bayview Bridge and/or the Coal Harbor Drag, or different placement of the closed tracks so they screw up free roam roads, or both... Then some other maps may include even East Bayview textures and/or that west possible highway thing texture, etc, etc. In the end it's down to what purpose you have for your map and reaching it. The reason why a single correct geographical map for UG2 can't be made is because placing some closed tracks on the map would mess up free roam roads according to the surroundings of these tracks while some other closed tracks are not even in Bayview according to their surroundings because they are in Olympic city (like Industrial Park), period. This issue didn't exist in Carbon because placing canyons and San Juan and Drift Course on the map never resulted in messing up free roam roads."

gRiM If we place the Drift and Street x tracks on the map, the only way possible to make them fit where they're suppose to be is to shrink them (10 times smaller to be exact). And as you've said it is nearly impossible to make a perfectly correct geographical map. For example my theory about the location of bayview bridge track is correct if we consider the river's lenght as shown on the map/gps. But if we take the one in game it's impossible for another bridge to be placed anywhere.

Yeah that makes sense, I think I said something like this in my theory. Basically if we make the city larger like the size of a real life city (ex. LA, NY). It is a possibility that we can take into account.

EDIT: found what I have said - "if we say that the destination between the tunnel and the bridge connecting the city to beacon hill is more realistic (let's say more than 250m from one another)"

NOw what we need is to make this map into a real and completed thing, in the way how Carbon's was made.